Tom Lane wrote:
>
> The key phrase in that being "some way or another". Red Hat works with
> a concept of core vs extras (or another way to look at it being what
> comes on the CDs vs what you have to download from someplace). I think
> it's highly likely that libpgtypes would end up in extras. If you do
> not make it possible to package it that way (ie, separately from libpq),
> it's more likely that it won't get packaged at all than that it will be
> put in core.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
I'll buy this. Better to be safe then sorry. This patch becomes more
flexible and distributable when separated.
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
