Tom Lane wrote:
> Better support for arrays and composites is certainly something that
> people might want, but the problem with this design is that it forces
> them to buy into a number of other decisions that they don't necessarily
> want.
>
> I could see adding four functions to libpq that create and parse
> the textual representations of arrays and records.
>
>
>
Well, that was the part that interested me, so let me now speak up in
favor of better array/record support in libpq.
cheers
andrew
