Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thursday 03 April 2008 19:08, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>>>> Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> First whack at exposing the start and finish checkpoint times into
>>>>> SQL.
>>>>>
>>>> Why is that useful?
>>>>
>>> For knowing how long checkpoints are taking. If they are taking too
>>> long you may need to adjust your bgwriter settings, and it is a
>>> serious drag to parse postgresql logs for this info.
>>>
>> Even if this were true, surely the answer is to improve the logging.
>>
>>
>
> Exposing everything into the log files isn't always sufficient (says the guy
> who maintains a remote admin tool)
>
It should be now that you can have machine readable logs (says the guy
who literally spent weeks making that happen) ;-)
cheers
andrew
