Re: Script binaries renaming - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Script binaries renaming
Date
Msg-id 47EA4C1D.8090909@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Script binaries renaming  (Zdeněk Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers

Zdeněk Kotala wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan napsal(a):
>>
>>
>> Zdeněk Kotala wrote:
>>> Question is also how many users really use these commands. For 
>>> example vacuumdb is not too important now when we have autovacuum.
>>
>> This is not true. Plenty of apps will quite reasonably choose to 
>> follow large batch updates by a single vacuumdb rather than using 
>> autovacuum.
>
> Yes, up to 8.2, but I think situation for 8.3 could be different. We 
> have more works, autovacuum is better and so on.
>
>

Again, this is just not true. It might not be a situation you run  
across, but autovacuum does not suit all needs. This includes 8.3.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zdeněk Kotala
Date:
Subject: Re: Script binaries renaming
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT