Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>> I would like the requirements defined by the -www and sysadmins teams.
>>> I don't want us to go off and create yet more infrastructure without
>>> full documentation and understanding of the purpose and whether it is
>>> redundant.
>>>
>>> This list is currently redundant as we have the resources and
>>> technology already in place to deal with this. I think you are
>>> attacking the wrong problem Bruce.
>> For how often it happens, its worth nothing: I agree 100% with Joshua
>> here, but, if Bruce wants to create a list on his personal domain (which,
>> in itself is a failure point as it requires that *his* domain is not 100%
>> perfect), it doesn't mean that anyone actually has to *use* it ... I know
>> I never will, since there already exist faster, more reliable, contact
>> methods ...
>
> I think we need a more centralized contact system than we have now.
> Personally when I don't get email I am unsure who to contact (because
> community email is down). The email list was a method to centralize
> that. The list of possible contact methods listed confirms my point.
the sysadmin team already maintains a list of emergency contacts
including external email, phone numbers, alternative contacts in
addition to the what we are usually using to communicate (IM,personal
email, the lists) - not sure if we need to duplicate that ...
Stefan
