Josh Berkus wrote:
> KaiGai,
>
>> A flexible framework is worthwhile for both operating systems.
>> Please confirm it to the TS folks.
>
> Yep, that's the idea. Glenn was fine with your stuff last year, I expect
> it'll still be fine.
>
> Other than SELinux and TrustedSolaris, does anyone know of other role-based or
> multilevel security frameworks we should check against? I'd like to have any
> security framework we approve be plug-in adaptable to everything out there.
In the recent news,
http://www.sun.com/aboutsun/pr/2008-03/sunflash.20080313.1.xml
NSA and SUN announces a new project launched which tries to port FLASK
security architecture, it is named as FMAC.
It can be a good candidate to host multilevel database security.
(SELinux is also based on FLASK security architecture.)
SEBSD project is also known. It is a poring of SELinux into BSD platform. SEBSD: http://www.trustedbsd.org/sebsd.html
Thanks,
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
