Re: Recomendations on raid controllers raid 1+0 - Mailing list pgsql-performance
From | Leigh Dyer |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Recomendations on raid controllers raid 1+0 |
Date | |
Msg-id | 47D9B566.3050907@eclinic.com.au Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Recomendations on raid controllers raid 1+0 (Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>) |
Responses |
Re: Recomendations on raid controllers raid 1+0
|
List | pgsql-performance |
Glyn Astill wrote: > Bonie++ benchmarks below. > > I believe the the Perc 5/i Raid 10 mode is actually a span of mirrors, rather than the expected stripe of mirrors we shouldexpect from 1+0, and that this is the reason for the shitty performance. > Could you build three RAID-1 mirrors on the device, and then stripe that using software RAID-0? Thanks Leigh > > RAID 5 > ====== > Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- > -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks-- > Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP > way5a 32096M 55354 97 201375 59 109586 23 59934 97 427541 33 767.9 1 > ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create-------- > -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- > files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP > 16 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ > way5a,32096M,55354,97,201375,59,109586,23,59934,97,427541,33,767.9,1,16,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++ > > RAID 10 > ======= > Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- > -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks-- > Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP > Way5a 32096M 53479 99 131640 33 66718 10 58225 95 339287 25 699.1 1 > ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create-------- > -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- > files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP > 16 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ > Way5a,32096M,53479,99,131640,33,66718,10,58225,95,339287,25,699.1,1,16,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++ > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com> >> To: Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk> >> Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org >> Sent: Thursday, 13 March, 2008 3:58:41 PM >> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Recomendations on raid controllers raid 1+0 >> >> Glyn, >> >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Glyn Astill wrote: >>> I'm looking at switching out the perc5i (lsi megaraid) cards from our >>> Dell 2950s for something else as they're crap at raid 10. >> Do you have numbers? Perc 5/i cards perform quite well for us (we have >> a 8 disks RAID 10 in a 2900 server with the traditional Perc 5/i). >> >> -- >> Guillaume > > > ___________________________________________________________ > Rise to the challenge for Sport Relief with Yahoo! For Good > > http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/ > >
pgsql-performance by date: