Re: pg_streamrecv for 9.1? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_streamrecv for 9.1?
Date
Msg-id 47D4C790-B63A-4315-BE64-5A3AB389846E@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_streamrecv for 9.1?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_streamrecv for 9.1?  (Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>)
Re: pg_streamrecv for 9.1?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Re: pg_streamrecv for 9.1?  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Dec 29, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Is it really stable enough for bin/?  My impression of the state of
> affairs is that there is nothing whatsoever about replication that
> is really stable yet.

Well, that's not stopping us from shipping a core feature called "replication".  I'll defer to others on how mature
pg_streamrecvis, but if it's no worse than replication in general I think putting it in bin/ is the right thing to do. 

...Robert

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO item for pg_ctl and server detection