Re: WIP: guc enums - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: WIP: guc enums
Date
Msg-id 47CEB63A.3060606@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: guc enums  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Having to have two extra hook functions for every variable
> seems like a lot of notational overhead for not much gain.
>

+1

cheers

andrew

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Heikki Linnakangas"
Date:
Subject: Re: CopyReadLineText optimization
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: guc enums