Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Steve Clark <sclark@netwolves.com> writes:
>>
>>> I'm not sure I understand what you mean about TEXT being null-safe.
>>> What are the issues, and why was
>>> it supported for years and now abruptly changed.
>>>
>> It never was supported, we are simply plugging a hole that let you
>> create a text value that would be likely to malfunction in subsequent
>> use.
>>
>
> Seems we never documented that chr(0) is not supported. I have applied
> the following doc patch to CVS HEAD and 8.3.X.
>
>
> The NULL (0) character is not
> allowed because text data types cannot reliably store such bytes.
>
>
"Reliably" is arguably misleading here.
cheers
andrew
