Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Chris
Subject Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
Date
Msg-id 47BD0C41.5000509@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Chris" <dmagick@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> When I said "obfuscating" I meant it. I'm pretty familiar with sh scripting
>>> and I'm not even sure what the && behaviour would do.
>> It chains commands together so if the first fails the second doesn't happen.
>
> I meant in this case, not in general. That is, does it introduce a subshell?

Ah - my misunderstanding then. No idea about that one.

--
Postgresql & php tutorials
http://www.designmagick.com/

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
Next
From: "Markus Bertheau"
Date:
Subject: planner favors seq scan too early