Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
Date
Msg-id 47AB445F.50704@hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:00:33 -0300
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> 
>> Joshua D. Drake escribió:
>>
>>> I am not arguing any particular solution but home brewing a
>>> solution so people can stay on what is definitely a dying SCM is
>>> dumb. There are so many tools available to us that we *don't* have
>>> to modify, bend, break or if you like, improve that any argument
>>> outside of, "We are used to CVS" is just hand waving and that
>>> argument is sad.
>> Actually, in using Subversion I've found it broken enough that a
>> migration to it does not offer that much of an advantage over staying
>> with CVS.
> 
> I repeat. I am not arguing a particular solution. I am arguing against
> creating more internal infrastructure and the relevant support
> requirements when other solutions exist.

Just so we can stop talking about this, it does seem it works with CVS -  it's just not necessarily documented that
way...

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
Next
From: Aidan Van Dyk
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan