Limit changes query plan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
| From | Gaetano Mendola |
|---|---|
| Subject | Limit changes query plan |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | 47A2FDC8.1010403@bigfoot.com Whole thread Raw |
| Responses |
Re: Limit changes query plan
|
| List | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I'm using 8.2.6 and I'm observing a trange behaviour using
offset and limits.
This are the two queries that are puzzling me:
explain SELECT c.id, tsk, lir, nctr, nctn, ncts, rvel,ecp, pvcp, pvcc,pvcf,pvcl,ldcn,ogtd,sgti FROM
t_OA_2_00_cardc JOIN t_OA_2_00_dt dt ON (dt.card_id = c.id) WHERE ecp=18 AND _to >= 1500 AND _from <= 1550
ORDERBY nctr,nctn,ncts,rvel offset 0 ; QUERY PLAN
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=175044.75..175071.04 rows=10518 width=90) -> Sort (cost=175044.75..175071.04 rows=10518 width=90)
SortKey: c.nctr, c.nctn, c.ncts, c.rvel -> Hash Join (cost=25830.72..174342.12 rows=10518 width=90)
HashCond: (c.id = dt.card_id) -> Bitmap Heap Scan on t_oa_2_00_card c (cost=942.36..148457.19 rows=101872
width=90) Recheck Cond: (ecp = 18) -> Bitmap Index Scan on i7_t_oa_2_00_card
(cost=0.00..916.89rows=101872 width=0) Index Cond: (ecp = 18) -> Hash
(cost=22743.45..22743.45rows=171593 width=8) -> Bitmap Heap Scan on t_oa_2_00_dt dt
(cost=2877.26..22743.45rows=171593 width=8) Recheck Cond: (_from <= 1550)
Filter: (_to >= 1500) -> Bitmap Index Scan on i_oa_2_00_dt_from (cost=0.00..2834.36
rows=182546width=0) Index Cond: (_from <= 1550)
explain SELECT c.id, tsk, lir, nctr, nctn, ncts, rvel,ecp, pvcp, pvcc,pvcf,pvcl,ldcn,ogtd,sgti FROM
t_OA_2_00_cardc JOIN t_OA_2_00_dt dt ON (dt.card_id = c.id) WHERE ecp=18 AND _to >= 1500 AND _from <= 1550
ORDERBY nctr,nctn,ncts,rvel offset 0 limit 5; QUERY PLAN
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=0.00..2125.12 rows=5 width=90) -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..4470402.02 rows=10518 width=90) ->
IndexScan using i_oa_2_00_card_keys on t_oa_2_00_card c (cost=0.00..3927779.56 rows=101872 width=90)
Filter:(ecp = 18) -> Index Scan using i_oa_2_00_dt_for on t_oa_2_00_dt dt (cost=0.00..5.31 rows=1 width=8)
Index Cond: (dt.card_id = c.id) Filter: ((_to >= 1500) AND (_from <= 1550))
using the limit I have an execution time of minutes vs a some seconds.
What am I missing here ?
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHov3I7UpzwH2SGd4RApR+AJ0dG/+0MoB3PMD1kRgQt0BisHwQBACgzVwC
BN/SBWrvVxVE9eBLK0C1Pnw=
=9Ucp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pgsql-hackers by date: