Gregory Youngblood wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 23:46 +0000, Gordan Bobic wrote:
>> David Fetter wrote:
>> > In that case, use one of the existing solutions. They're all way
>> > easier than re-inventing the wheel.
>>
>> Existing solutions can't handle multiple masters. MySQL can do it at
>> least in a ring arrangement.
>>
> What about pgcluster? It's supposed to be able to provide synchronous
> multi-master replication for postgresql.
I looked at that, too, but it wasn't really a "cluster of equal peers"
sort of solution, which is what I am after. Still, thanks for pointing
it out.
Gordan
