Re: Overblogging etc - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Overblogging etc |
Date | |
Msg-id | 478BCF1E.2070505@hagander.net Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Overblogging etc (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
List | pgsql-www |
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 15:20 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Magus Ha gander wrote: >>> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>> Simon Riggs wrote: >>>>>>> I suggest we allow 1 blog per week per person and that the blogs must be >>>>>>> about something constructive, not just a one liner about getting out of >>>>>>> the bath or other trivial subjects. Since we have only a few blog slots >>>>>>> it's a shame when long useful blogs are replaced by trivial ones. >>>>>> I strongly object to this. We should encourage *more* blogging, not less. >>>>> I agree with more blogging, but I think we must avoid clogging. >>>>> >>>>> I've not seen anyone write an interesting blog that comes out almost >>>>> daily, so I don't think once per week is restrictive on the types of >>>>> content we really want to see. It can be a guideline. >>>> The reason I have so many blog entries is that I just started a Postgres >>>> blog and had some pent-up items to post about. >>>> >>>> As far as long entries, you wil not see them from me. I am usually >>>> brief, even in email. And I probably will be pretty frequent. >>> There's a difference between brief and one-liners. Brief is fine by me. >>> To look at your blog as an example, the latest two posts are absolute >>> fine - while brief. It's the first two one-liners that seem a bit >>> unnecessary for syndication. >> I assume Planet PostgreSQL is for blogging, not for writing technical >> articles. If every blog posting is going to go through such scrutiny it >> isn't worth it for me to be on Planet PostgreSQL. Feel free to remove >> me. >> >> The bottom line is that every Planet PostgreSQL blog items takes the >> same space on the Postgres web site as an event or training course. >> This significantly raises the bar on what you want to have on Planet >> PostgreSQL. Obviously a significant number of people are willing to >> write article-length postings to reach that bar; I am not. > > If you had written as much on your blog as you had here, nobody would > have said a thing. Nobody has asked for an article, but writing multiple > one line blogs in succession is clearly different. That wouldn't be > acceptable from Mr.Marketing of Company XYZ, so must include you also. Can't we just say that it's noted, and ask Bruce to try to stay away from the one-liners in his PostgreSQL bog, and just *give it a rest*. *please*? > Editorial guidelines apply in all other cases, including for example > long debates about whether words have "s" or "z" in them. If anybody > posted that they were going to refuse to write docs ever again as a > result, they would be considered unreasonable. Yes, they would be considered unreasonable. But I for one would certainly not question them blogging about it if that's the decision they made. //Magnus