Guido Neitzer wrote:
> On 08.01.2008, at 23:20, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> That isn't really an extensibility argument.
>
> I was thinking about that too - for me, it still is just an outstanding
> issue with PostgreSQL. It is incredibly scalable on one machine but it
> totally sucks when you want more, but not much more.
There are OS level things you can do here.
> But if you need something easy to setup, multi-master with just two
> machines, easy fail-over (done in the JDBC driver) without your
> application even noticing it - try it.
http://www.continuent.org/HomePage
> It's free, but not open source.
> And it's a good product. I use it for some stuff and PostgreSQL for
> other projects. Just depends on the requirements.
>
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
> cug
>
