Re: Inconsistent results from seqscan and gist indexscan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Inconsistent results from seqscan and gist indexscan
Date
Msg-id 477813.1637981511@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inconsistent results from seqscan and gist indexscan  (Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 5:23 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 2:10 PM Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Seems point_inside() does not handle NaN properly.

>> This is unfortunately a known issue, which was reported twice ([1] and
>> [2]) already.  There's a patch proposed for it:
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/2710/ (adding Horiguchi-san in
>> Cc).

> Ah, I missed the previous threads. Good to know there is a patch fixing
> it.

Note that that patch seems pretty well stalled; if you'd like to
see it move forward, please pitch in and help review.

(Maybe we should scale back the patch's ambitions, and just try
to get the seqscan/indexscan inconsistency fixed.)

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side