On 19.05.22 18:09, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Taking it a step further.
> Created a new patch into commitfest, targeting 16 version.
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3645/
> <https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3645/>
I have committed your 001 patch, which was clearly a (harmless) mistake.
I have also committed a patch that gets rid of MemSet() calls where the
value is a constant not-0, because that just falls back to memset() anyway.
I'm on board with trying to get rid of MemSet(), but first I need to
analyze all the performance numbers and arguments that were shown in
this thread.
