Colin Wetherbee wrote:
> My guess, having written this, is that your approach might be more
> useful for applications that rely heavily on interaction with a
> database. I'd appreciate any more comments you have on this, though.
Tom, Sam, and Ted (a lovely assortment of three-letter names), thank you
very much for your input on my situation. You've given me quite a lot
to consider.
For now, I will stick with Tom's and Ted's recommendations for a while,
but I'll also keep Sam's ideas in mind if this application becomes more
heavily reliant on the database.
Colin
