Re: Slow PITR restore - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Slow PITR restore
Date
Msg-id 47600005.8040506@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Slow PITR restore  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Slow PITR restore
List pgsql-general
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 22:21 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>>> ... Now I understand that restoring log files can be slow but this is a big
>>> machine.
>> Yeah, restoring is known to be less than speedy, because essentially
>> zero optimization work has been done on it.
>
> If there was a patch to improve this, would it be applied to 8.3?
>

Sheesh Simon you are really pushing this release :). I would love to see
a patch to resolve this, especially since it appears to be a fairly
glaring oversight. We can't really expect people to use PITR if they new
it would take hours to recover even on the size of machine I was working on.

On the other hand... we are about to go to RC1 :)

Joshua D. Drake

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Southern California Linux Expo
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Better alternative for Primary Key then serial??