Re: Evaluation of PG performance vs MSDE/MSSQL 2000 (not 2005) - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Evaluation of PG performance vs MSDE/MSSQL 2000 (not 2005)
Date
Msg-id 4757B7F0.2030608@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Evaluation of PG performance vs MSDE/MSSQL 2000 (not 2005)  (Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Evaluation of PG performance vs MSDE/MSSQL 2000 (not 2005)  (Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>)
List pgsql-performance
Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> BTW you mention both EnterpriseDB PostgreSQL 8.3 beta and just
> PostgreSQL 8.3 beta in the text above. Both of these are different -
> which one are you actually using?

No they're not. EnterpriseDB Postgres ships entirely standard binaries -
in fact, the Windows build uses the exact same binaries I build for the
community installer.

EnterpriseDB Postgres is essentially a packaging and bundling project in
which the aim is to provide consistent and easy to use installers for
Windows, Mac and Linux that allow users to get started with Postgres,
Slony, PostGIS, pgAdmin, phpPgAdmin etc...

EnterpriseDB Advanced Server is the entirely different product - thats
the one that includes the Oracle compatibility and replication/migration
tools etc.

Regards, Dave.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Mark Cave-Ayland
Date:
Subject: Re: Evaluation of PG performance vs MSDE/MSSQL 2000 (not 2005)
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: TB-sized databases