Re: One or more tables? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: One or more tables?
Date
Msg-id 4752F9B3.90106@cox.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to One or more tables?  (rokj <rjaklic@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/02/07 07:35, rokj wrote:
> Hi.
>
> For an example let me say that I have a big (over 1 million) user
> "base". Then every user does a lot of inserting/updating of data.
> Would it be better to create different tables for insert/updating for
> every user or  would it be better just to have one big table with all
> data (tables would have of course the same columns, ...). How do you
> cope with this kind of things?
>
> 1.example (1 enormous table)
> tablename (id, user_id, datetime, some_data)
>
> 2. example (a big number of tables)
> tablename_user_id( id, datetime, some_data)

This should help you to decide how to design your tables.  3NF is as
far as you really need to go.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_normalization
http://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/Pub0009/LPMArticle.asp?ID=88

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHUvmzS9HxQb37XmcRAnNhAJ4/bMbLyDXioe7duTO4Dm0vBD8TCgCg3H84
/+gRlkgyuIlRYYGOGH8LWPM=
=LfO7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql in ramdisk
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: "relation deleted while in use" encountered with Postgresql 8.0.8