Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Date
Msg-id 474CCCD0.3050907@cox.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
Responses Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance  ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/27/07 19:35, Greg Smith wrote:
[snip]
> to you.  The minute performance becomes a serious concern, you'd be much
> better off with Linux, one of the BSDs that's not hobbled by using the
> Mach kernel, or one of the more serious UNIXes like Solaris.

Wasn't there a time (2 years ago?) when PG ran pretty dog-like on SPARC?

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHTMzQS9HxQb37XmcRAo91AJ0d1l1LW0REaUEyVwrkhAF7u6+EYgCaA1aG
/qrqS5JebnStbMbO/QD+YA0=
=U6ta
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Next
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance