Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>
>> Am Montag, 19. November 2007 schrieb Tom Lane:
>>
>>> Maybe, but "HTML-type" is an unhelpful description. Isn't there a more
>>> general markup standard that subsumes both HTML and XML? (I seem to
>>> recall that SGML might be that, but not sure.)
>>>
>
>
>> I think "XML tag" would actually cover anything that would be valid as an HTML
>> tag.
>>
>
> +1 for "XML tag", then.
>
>
>
Changed to XML tag and XML entity. Code names adjusted accordingly.
Committed.
cheers
andrew
