Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> I don't approve of the changes to the exposed token type names, but
>>> the state machine changes seem sane first-glance.
>>>
>
>
>> Well, I think it's just plain wrong to describe as HTML tags and
>> entities things that just aren't.
>>
>
> Maybe, but "HTML-type" is an unhelpful description. Isn't there a more
> general markup standard that subsumes both HTML and XML? (I seem to
> recall that SGML might be that, but not sure.)
>
>
>
Most people haven't heard of SGML. I'd settle for "XML tag" or maybe
"XML/HTML tag".
Any other bids?
cheers
andrew
