Re: Stability, PR - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Stability, PR
Date
Msg-id 474.1022105471@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Stability, PR  ("Reuven M. Lerner" <reuven@lerner.co.il>)
List pgsql-general
"Reuven M. Lerner" <reuven@lerner.co.il> writes:
> I've managed to convince each of these clients that PostgreSQL is
> indeed a reliable database.  But I I still have to wonder: Is there
> any truth to these statements?  Is it simply FUD, or was PostgreSQL
> once prone to data corruption?

Before about 7.0, I'd have said it was a reasonable complaint.
We've done an awful lot to improve reliability over the last few
releases.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Doug McNaught
Date:
Subject: Re: multiple version running
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: multiple version running