Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3
Date
Msg-id 473D210F.10100@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> scrappy@postgresql.org (Marc G. Fournier) writes:
>>         configure (r1.570 -> r1.571)
>>         (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/configure?r1=1.570&r2=1.571)
> 
> It appears that Marc has got autoconf 2.61 installed now, instead of the
> 2.59 that we've been using for some time.  I'm a bit concerned about the
> implications of switching to a version that's got zero track record for
> us, and that AFAIK no other committers have installed.  I'd rather see
> a switch happen at the start of a devel cycle than at beta3; and in any
> case it's got to be coordinated so that what is in the release doesn't
> vary depending on who committed last.

O.k., so what do you want to do? Or more to the point, is there 
something I can help with? I have machines with 2.59... Marc do you have 
any left with 2.59?

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
> 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3