Re: dell versus hp - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jurgen Haan
Subject Re: dell versus hp
Date
Msg-id 47348444.6000700@easyflex.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to dell versus hp  (Tore Halset <halset@pvv.ntnu.no>)
Responses Re: dell versus hp
List pgsql-performance
Apart from the disks, you might also investigate using Opterons instead
of Xeons. there appears to be some significant dent in performance
between Opteron and Xeon. Xeons appear to spend more time in passing
around ownership of memory cache lines in case of a spinlock.
It's not yet clear whether or not here has been worked around the issue.
You should at least investigate it a bit.

We're using a HP DL385 ourselves which performs quite well.

-R-

Tore Halset wrote:
> Hello.

> 1) Dell 2900 (5U)
> 8 * 146 GB SAS 15Krpm 3,5"
> 8GB ram
> Perc 5/i. battery backup. 256MB ram.
> 2 * 4 Xeon 2,66GHz
>
> 2) Dell 2950 (2U)
> 8 * 146 GB SAS 10Krpm 2,5" (not really selectable, but I think the
> webshop is wrong..)
> 8GB ram
> Perc 5/i. battery backup. 256MB ram.
> 2 * 4 Xeon 2,66GHz
>
> 3) HP ProLiant DL380 G5 (2U)
> 8 * 146 GB SAS 10Krpm 2,5"
> 8GB ram
> P400 raid controller. battery backup. 512MB ram.
> 2 * 2 Xeon 3GHz
>


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD