Re: Visibility map thoughts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Visibility map thoughts
Date
Msg-id 4731DCFC.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Visibility map thoughts  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Visibility map thoughts
List pgsql-hackers
>>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2007 at  3:13 PM, in message
<47322A7E.8060000@enterprisedb.com>, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2007 at  8:18 AM, in message <473077AD.30101@enterprisedb.com>,
>> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The indexam API needs to be modified as well, because there's currently
>>> no API to return index tuples from an index.
>>
>> I know this is tangential, but expanding the types of selection
>> criteria which can be applied to index entries (beyond equality and
>> range tests) might fall out of this, yes?
>
> What else so you have in mind?
>
> With index-only-scans, it would sometimes make sense to do a full index
> scan. I wasn't thinking of anything else on that front myself.
I know this issue on this thread has come up at least one or two
other times lately:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2007-08/msg00113.php
I know it's a largely independent issue, but your comment about the
API not giving access to the index tuples echoed comments regarding
what it would take to allow optimizations in this area.
-Kevin




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Visibility map thoughts
Next
From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Date:
Subject: New tzdata available