Chris Browne wrote:
> tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) writes:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>>> Perhaps both these considerations dictate providing another command or a
>>> special flavor of \l instead of just modifying it?
>> I've seen no argument made why \l should print this info at all.
>
> Its interesting information, but I agree that there are BIG
> disadvantages to adding it to \l directly. If there's an "\lv" or
> such, where it's more certain that people want extended information,
> and perhaps that they have appropriate permissions.
Humm... I wonder, instead of putting it in \l, what if we had a \stats
that print stuff just about the db your connected to, and it could
probably find a bunch of other info to print besides just the dbsize.
-Andy
