> By "last patch" you mean > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-10/msg00409.php > ? Sorry for confusion, I meant this one: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2007-10/msg00217.php Is it the same as the commited one? > If so that's about as fast as it's likely to get. 22 tables is well > beyond what I'd consider reasonable to run through the exhaustive > planner. You should try geqo again. OK, no problem... Anyway, many thanks for the quick patches! Kuba
pgsql-bugs by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных