Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>
>> I know I just love it when a customer breaks something and I ask what
>> changed and it is 56 different things ;)
>>
>> My question is.. with a checkpoint every 2 months, would it make it
>> very easy to release every 6 (or 4 or 3 or 9) months? I am not saying
>> we "have" to but it certainly opens up the possibility to the argument
>> I made.
>
> We could release "alpha" releases. But that assumes that these reviews
> actually result in stuff getting committed even if they're not 100% complete.
That's sounding a lot like mysql.. Next you'll start recommending people
to run that in production.. :-P
//Magnus
