Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Those who have been with the community from long ago might remember
>> discussion about implementing a undo log. The big advantage of this is
>> that it allows UPDATE to _replace_ rows and limits the amount of cleanup
>> required for UPDATEs.
>>
>> I am hoping that with HOT we will no longer have any need to even
>> consider undo.
>>
>
> We were considering it?
I don't ever remember us considering it seriously.
>
> I certainly wasn't. I've enough experience with Oracle and InnoDB to
> see that an undo log is its own set of performane issues. No thanks.
>
It certainly does.
Joshua D. Drake
