Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5?
Date
Msg-id 47174E86.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5?  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5?
List pgsql-hackers
>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:23 AM, in message
<87ejfswfvw.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>, Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
wrote:
> If it's set to 0
> then there's no real reason we need to wal log lock operations.
Do we currently take advantage of that fact, or log them anyway?
-Kevin




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Billow Gao"
Date:
Subject: Re: Can a C function(server program) be a UDP or TCP server?
Next
From: Jan de Visser
Date:
Subject: Re: Can a C function(server program) be a UDP or TCP server?