Re: Windows and locales and UTF-8 (oh my) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Windows and locales and UTF-8 (oh my)
Date
Msg-id 47139B7C.1020908@hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Windows and locales and UTF-8 (oh my)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Windows and locales and UTF-8 (oh my)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 01:53:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>>> I am thinking that Dave's discovery explains some previously unsolved
>>>>> bug reports, such as
>>>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2007-05/msg00260.php
>> ...
>> And given that, do we even nede to special-case lc_ctype_is_c() at all? If
>> we never pass in a .65001 locale (which we don't, because it fails)?
> 
> Hmm.  If it doesn't need a special case, then we still lack an
> explanation for the aforementioned bug report.

From what I can tell that report doesn't tell us very much - we don't
know server encoding, we don't know server locale, we don't even know
client encoding. So I don't think we know anywhere *near* enough to say
it's related to this.

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows and locales and UTF-8 (oh my)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows and locales and UTF-8 (oh my)