Re: Estimate the size of the SQL file generated by pg_dump utility

From: Tom Lane
Subject: Re: Estimate the size of the SQL file generated by pg_dump utility
Date: ,
Msg-id: 4706.1173195097@sss.pgh.pa.us
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: Estimate the size of the SQL file generated by pg_dump utility  ("Craig A. James")
Responses: Re: Estimate the size of the SQL file generated by pg_dump utility  (Richard Troy)
List: pgsql-performance


"Craig A. James" <> writes:
> Bill Moran wrote:
>> I have no idea if that's legally binding or not, but I've talked to a few
>> associates who have some experience in law, and they all argue that email
>> disclaimers probably aren't legally binding anyway -- so the result is
>> undefined.

> No, it's not legally binding.  Agreements are only binding if both
> parties agree, and someone sending you email has not consented to your
> statement.

To take this back to the PG problem: it's probably true that we can
ignore disclaimers as far as receiving, redistributing, and archiving
mail list submissions goes.  On the other hand, accepting a patch is
another matter.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-performance by date:

From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Automated test-suite for Postgres
From: Jeff Cole
Date:
Subject: Re: