Re: quickly getting the top N rows - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Richard Huxton
Subject Re: quickly getting the top N rows
Date
Msg-id 470554B9.6070506@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: quickly getting the top N rows  ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On 10/4/07, Ben <bench@silentmedia.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> You're being about as clear as mud here, except that you obviously lied
>>> about what you were doing in your first message.  If you have a planner
>>> problem, show us the *exact* query, the *exact* table definition, and
>>> unfaked EXPLAIN ANALYZE output.
>> I didn't realize that simplification was viewed as so sinister, but
>> thanks, I'll remember that in the future.
>
> It's not sinister, it's counterproductive and wastes people's time.

Unless "Ben" is an alias for someone high up with an unnamed rival
database, seeking to distract us all... How do you find out the IP
address of a yacht? ;-)

--
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: quickly getting the top N rows
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: quickly getting the top N rows