Re: dynamic-static date once again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: dynamic-static date once again
Date
Msg-id 4702.1000735899@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: dynamic-static date once again  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org> writes:
>> I think we have agreed that 'current' is a Bad Idea and should be
>> eliminated from the date/time datatypes...

> I've started purging it from the timestamp code I'm working on for 7.2.

Oh good.  Let's not forget to review the pg_proc entries after that
happens, to see which ones can safely be marked cachable.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bryon Lape
Date:
Subject: Re: NewYork Bombing: SQL server bomb proof!!
Next
From: Rums Dabs
Date:
Subject: CD-RW Scheduled Database Backup...