Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>
>
>> Another possibility is to treat the case as a WARNING if you're
>> superuser and an ERROR if you're not. This would satisfy people
>> who are uncomfortable with the idea that CREATEDB privilege comes
>> with a built-in denial-of-service attack, while still leaving a
>> loophole for anyone for whom the test didn't work properly.
>>
>
> That sounds like a good combination
>
>
+1
cheers
andrew
