-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Steve Atkins wrote:
>> We don't *promote* the alias ... we mention it in the FAQ as being
>> *accepted*
>
> It's not just mentioned in the FAQ as being accepted. The FAQ uses a
> random mish-mash of both Postgres and PostgreSQL. In most cases
> it feels as though they're two closely related, but different products.
>
> For example, FAQ 1.2 talks about PostgreSQL, then parenthetically
> tells people to look elsewhere to get involved in Postgres development.
>
> FAQ 1.3 makes it clear that Windows XP and friends will run
> PostgreSQL, but Windows 95 and friends can only run Postgres.
Hmmm... I didn't see these changes. These are clearly bad and short
sighted, nor were they approved by consensus.
Joshua D. Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG+9kMATb/zqfZUUQRAhkqAJ0S1ISYhrczEmuH3pvxpBP8D5h8KwCeNi6H
Tgt8vP1msyFS1vR8zs/JBBw=
=5Bss
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
