-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> - --On Thursday, September 27, 2007 02:17:18 -0400 Bruce Momjian
>> <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>>>> Yes, you do. You may try not to, and you may do it less, but you
>>>> certainly do. Which just proves the force of habit.
>>> Yea, I am sure you are right. We also say "water" strangely (Wu-der)
>>> which confuses many people too.
>> The point being made is/was that although Postgres is considered as acceptable
>> as Philly is, PostgreSQL is the official name, and what should be used in the
>> *official* documentation ...
>
> OK, but when how do we promote the alias?
We don't, there is no reason to. It exists. That is enough. It will get
used or it won't. I imagine it will.
> And isn't the FAQ official?
> We don't have a community that lives together to promote an alias --- we
> have to do it in print somehow. Have you looked at the FAQ changes.
> Please do --- I think it looks fine.
Are you talking about this FAQ change?
PostgreSQL is pronounced Post-Gres-Q-L, but can also be referred to as
simply Postgres, particularly in conversation. (For those curious about
how to say "PostgreSQL", an audio file is available.)
I didn't see any others. I have zero problem with the above.
Joshua D. Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG+9cZATb/zqfZUUQRAqVYAKCrOmA5PD8PyEJl2NG3NLhDpvGTTQCfRIg8
B2Q9D1nBEpZGNbppU+o99Sg=
=qk41
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
