Re: Hardware recommendation: which is best - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: Hardware recommendation: which is best
Date
Msg-id 46E6C684.9090006@cox.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hardware recommendation: which is best  ("Phoenix Kiula" <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Hardware recommendation: which is best  ("Phoenix Kiula" <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/11/07 11:26, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
> Thanks Greg.
>
>
>> You're not going to get a particularly useful answer here without giving
>> some specifics about the two disk controllers you're comparing, how much
>> cache they have, and whether they include a battery backup.
>>
[snip]
>
>
> Would appreciate any tips. From these two, Scenario 1 looks marginally
> better to me. I am requesting further information about cache and
> battery powered backup, but would appreciate first-off thoughts based
> on above info.

How (on average) large are the records you need to insert, and how
evenly spread across the 24 hour day do the inserts occur?

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG5saES9HxQb37XmcRAjZnAKCrPnIyuhuXm+InFpmn/bDiw/1xKgCg7xoC
pq4xdQ72BT4qFVqvy2g5RrM=
=EbRU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Franz.Rasper@izb.de
Date:
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: Hardware recommendation: which is best
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Sthange things happen: SkyTools pgbouncer is NOT a balancer