-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Yes, we've isolated it one server, so we've been able to bring the rest back
> online ... we're also working on getting our C class's split across two net
> links, so that if one gets saturated, it doesn't take everything out ...
Why isn't your ISP blocking this at the router level? This shouldn't
even be our (your) problem.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> --On Thursday, September 06, 2007 09:55:42 -0700 "Joshua D. Drake"
> <jdrake@postgresql.org> wrote:
>
>> Robert Treat wrote:
>>> Sending an email on this, in case you didn't get my page on the subject
>>> (should have been about an hour ago), but we're getting timeouts and
>>> significant packet loss on the above machines. Seems to be a problem
>>> somewhere between miami and panama. Any status information you can give
>>> would be appreciated.
>>>
>> It is my understanding that the network is being DOSd.
>
>> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
> Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG4DOHATb/zqfZUUQRAo1HAJ9P2oGnB7rEgFsQ+lGHHTjP+hqI0wCeOLVP
xW6WJmoUwdrTecKvcJ8ktL4=
=VCV0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
