Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date
Msg-id 46D71E00.2090804@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
List pgsql-advocacy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Let me ask a question, how many people who are against a name change now

> The bottom line is that the pronunciation/marketing problem with the
> name "PostgreSQL" is not going to change --- it is only going to get
> worse.

I am against the name change and I do not agree with your assessment. I
believe it will get better. As the only real problem is the initial
understanding and pronunciation. The rest is muscle memory.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



- --

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
            UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG1x4AATb/zqfZUUQRAiAaAJsFuoXcsNtTfKeI39izYoGmrlNBMwCfY6D9
cBTJB1WtslvmV0sgF7KEfdI=
=WLlk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)