Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Ron Mayer
Subject Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date
Msg-id 46D5C98A.8080805@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  (Ron Peterson <ron.peterson@yellowbank.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Ron Peterson wrote:
> 2007-08-28_10:53:41-0400 Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org>:
>> The google hits argument is no reason not to change the name.
> It is.  When people start searching for information using the term
> "postgres" they will be missing out on the vast majority of available
> information for years.

Some silver lining on this one, though - they'll mostly miss out
on older info like the "PostgresQL 6.2.1 on Red Hat 5.0 is slow"
comparison pages.

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Next
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)