Re: [GENERAL] One database vs. hundreds? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From btober@ct.metrocast.net
Subject Re: [GENERAL] One database vs. hundreds?
Date
Msg-id 46D41BA7.1070308@ct.metrocast.net
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
(On the GENERAL list) Kamil Srot wrote:
>
> Kynn Jones wrote:
>> I'm hoping to get some advice on a design question ...
>
>
> ...we use pgsql partitioning for other reasons
> and it has some of the features you want (data separation, query 
> performance, ...).
> It can be worth reading: 
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/ddl-partitioning.html

I'm not sure the tip is really what the OP is going to need -- I think 
he has a different problem in mind than that addresses -- but after a 
quick R of TFM, all I can say is HOLY CR** THAT IS COOL! Postrgresql was 
amazing when I first started using it at 7.2, and I'm continually 
astounded by learning new features and techniques made available by the 
continuing work of the development team.






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Heikki Linnakangas"
Date:
Subject: Re: Testing the other tsearch dictionaries
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Testing the other tsearch dictionaries