Re: Obfuscated definitions of database objects - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Obfuscated definitions of database objects
Date
Msg-id 46CF0AC6.9070004@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Obfuscated definitions of database objects  ("Charles N. Charotti" <ccharotti@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: Obfuscated definitions of database objects
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Charles N. Charotti wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
> 
> I want to know if there is any plan in future versions
> of PG to obfuscate the source code of some objects of
> the database, specially the functions of the backend ?

Functions in the backend written with most of the standard pl langauges
are interpreted. Thus no, they are plain text.

If you need obfuscation (and you don't, you just think you do, no
offense) use C.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



- --
     === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/        UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGzwrGATb/zqfZUUQRAphWAKCcq/RqRBabxKaqmaFHWbmqARITKgCfQcFg
Rg9u49kQcbVHz2ghhD3ZOd0=
=b+yg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Manuel Sugawara
Date:
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault using digest from pg_crypto
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Obfuscated definitions of database objects