Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> I guess my point is, if the patch looks good and does not appear to hurt
> anything, why not apply it? At least that way we can start to review the
> progress of the feature itself as it starts to see use.
>
>
I don't think that's a very good criterion. We need to have good
evidence that the change has positive benefit. We don't want to be doing
speculative changes.
cheers
andrew
