Re: Transactional DDL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: Transactional DDL
Date
Msg-id 46C29D47.4060805@cox.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Transactional DDL  ("Harpreet Dhaliwal" <harpreet.dhaliwal01@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/15/07 00:05, Harpreet Dhaliwal wrote:
> And this feature i.e. transactional DDL is not there in other major
> RDBMS like sql server, oracle etc?

Define "major".  Does it mean "popular" or "used on very large systems"?

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGwp1GS9HxQb37XmcRAtdIAKC+7kG6K4WVxgGGSVT/AHcWCo6I8gCfZ9y5
bVcXkbWY4E9OzYss8g1i7Q4=
=/dqV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Transactional DDL
Next
From: Chris
Date:
Subject: Re: Transactional DDL