Re: MVCC cons - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: MVCC cons
Date
Msg-id 46C25E06.9000709@cox.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MVCC cons  ("Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/14/07 20:36, Merlin Moncure wrote:
[snip]
>
> PostgreSQL wins in terms of better concurrency (especially in long
> transactions or transactions that touch a lot of records), cheap
> rollbacks, and all the advantages of a sophisticated locking engine
> (transactional ddl for example).

Although MVCC is not a /sine qua non/ of transactional ddl.

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGwl4GS9HxQb37XmcRAhm5AJ9pSZR08Vj5aOYtMnQdQaPsjtPMOQCghP+v
k81CxBZyH/42wHjPeT0Azvc=
=WRv0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: more select-for-update questions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Trigger not working as expected, first row gets a null value